Part of a series on
Politics
International relations (theory)
Public policy(doctrine) Domestic and foreign policy Civil society
Elections (voting)
Politics Portal

A policy is a deliberatesystem of principles to guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes. A policy is a statement of intent, and is implemented as a procedure or protocol. Policies are generally adopted by a governance body within an organization. Policies can assist in both subjective and objectivedecision making. Policies to assist in subjective decision making usually assist senior management with decisions that must be based on the relative merits of a number of factors, and as a result are often hard to test objectively, e.g. work-life balance policy. In contrast policies to assist in objective decision making are usually operational in nature and can be objectively tested, e.g. password policy.^[1]

The term may apply to government, private sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals. Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law. While law can compel or prohibit behaviors (e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income), policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome.^{[citation needed]}

Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of making important organizational decisions, including the identification of different alternatives such as programs or spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of the impact they will have. Policies can be understood as political, managerial, financial, and administrative mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals. In public corporate finance, a critical accounting policy is a policy for a firm/company or an industry that is considered to have a notably high subjective element, and that has a material impact on the financial statements.^{[citation needed]}

• 1Impact
• 4Typologies

Impact[edit]

Intended effects[edit]

The intended effects of a policy vary widely according to the organization and the context in which they are made. Broadly, policies are typically instituted to avoid some negative effect that has been noticed in the organization, or to seek some positive benefit.^{[citation needed]}

Corporate purchasing policies provide an example of how organizations attempt to avoid negative effects. Many large companies have policies that all purchases above a certain value must be performed through a purchasing process. By requiring this standard purchasing process through policy, the organization can limit waste and standardize the way purchasing is done.^{[citation needed]}

The State of California provides an example of benefit-seeking policy. In recent years, the numbers of hybrid cars in California has increased dramatically, in part because of policy changes in Federal law that provided USD $1,500 in tax credits (since phased out) as well as the use of high-occupancy vehicle lanes to hybrid owners (no loew hybrid vehicles). In this case, the organization (state and/or federal government) created an effect (increased ownership and use of hybrid vehicles) through policy (tax breaks, highway lanes).^{[citation needed]}

Unintended effects[edit]

Policies frequently have side effects or unintended consequences. Because the environments that policies seek to influence or manipulate are typically complex adaptive systems (e.g. governments, societies, large companies), making a policy change can have counterintuitive results. For example, a government may make a policy decision to raise taxes, in hopes of increasing overall tax revenue. Depending on the size of the tax increase, this may have the overall effect of reducing tax revenue by causing capital flight or by creating a rate so high that citizens are deterred from earning the money that is taxed. (See the Laffer curve.)^{[citation needed]}

The policy formulation process theoretically includes an attempt to assess as many areas of potential policy impact as possible, to lessen the chances that a given policy will have unexpected or unintended consequences.^{[citation needed]}

Policy cycle[edit]

In political science, the policy cycle is a tool used for the analyzing of the development of a policy item. It can also be referred to as a 'stagist approach', 'stages heuristic' or 'stages approach'. It is thus a rule of thumb rather than the actual reality of how policy is created, but has been influential in how political scientists looked at policy in general.^[2] It was developed as a theory from Harold Lasswell's work.

One version by James E. Anderson, in his Public Policy-Making (1974) has the following stages:

1. Agenda setting (Problem identification) – The recognition of certain subject as a problem demanding further government attention.
2. Policy Formulation – Involves exploring a variation of options or alternative courses of action available for addressing the problem. (appraisal, dialogue, formulation, and consolidation)
3. Decision-making – Government decides on an ultimate course of action, whether to perpetuate the policy status quo or alter it. (Decision could be 'positive', 'negative', or 'no-action')
4. Implementation – The ultimate decision made earlier will be put into practice.
5. Evaluation – Assesses the effectiveness of a public policy in terms of its perceived intentions and results. Policy actors attempt to determine whether the course of action is a success or failure by examining its impact and outcomes.

An eight step policy cycle is developed in detail in The Australian Policy Handbook by Peter Bridgman and Glyn Davis: (now with Catherine Althaus in its 4th and 5th editions)

1. Issue identification
2. Consultation (which permeates the entire process)
3. Policy instrument development
4. Building coordination and coalitions
5. Program Design: Decision making
6. Policy Implementation
7. Policy Evaluation

The Althaus, Bridgman & Davis model is heuristic and iterative. It is intentionally normative^{[clarification needed]} and not meant to be diagnostic^{[clarification needed]} or predictive. Policy cycles are typically characterized as adopting a classical approach, and tend to describe processes from the perspective of policy decision makers. Accordingly, some postpositivist academics challenge cyclical models as unresponsive and unrealistic, preferring systemic and more complex models.^[3] They consider a broader range of actors involved in the policy space that includes civil society organisations, the media, intellectuals, think tanks or policy research institutes, corporations, lobbyists, etc.

Content[edit]

Policies are typically promulgated through official written documents. Policy documents often come with the endorsement or signature of the executive powers within an organization to legitimize the policy and demonstrate that it is considered in force. Such documents often have standard formats that are particular to the organization issuing the policy. While such formats differ in form, policy documents usually contain certain standard components including ^{[citation needed]} :

• A purpose statement, outlining why the organization is issuing the policy, and what its desired effect or outcome of the policy should be.
• An applicability and scope statement, describing who the policy affects and which actions are impacted by the policy. The applicability and scope may expressly exclude certain people, organizations, or actions from the policy requirements. Applicability and scope is used to focus the policy on only the desired targets, and avoid unintended consequences where possible.
• An effective date which indicates when the policy comes into force. Retroactive policies are rare, but can be found.
• A responsibilities section, indicating which parties and organizations are responsible for carrying out individual policy statements. Many policies may require the establishment of some ongoing function or action. For example, a purchasing policy might specify that a purchasing office be created to process purchase requests, and that this office would be responsible for ongoing actions. Responsibilities often include identification of any relevant oversight and/or governance structures.
• Policy statements indicating the specific regulations, requirements, or modifications to organizational behavior that the policy is creating. Policy statements are extremely diverse depending on the organization and intent, and may take almost any form.

Some policies may contain additional sections, including:

• Background, indicating any reasons, history, ethical background statements, and/or intent that led to the creation of the policy, which may be listed as motivating factors. This information is often quite valuable when policies must be evaluated or used in ambiguous situations, just as the intent of a law can be useful to a court when deciding a case that involves that law.
• Definitions, providing clear and unambiguous definitions for terms and concepts found in the policy document.^{[citation needed]}

Typologies[edit]

The American political scientist Theodore J. Lowi proposed four types of policy, namely distributive, redistributive, regulatory and constituent in his article 'Four systems of Policy, Politics and Choice' and in 'American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory'.Policy addresses the intent of the organization, whether government, business, professional, or voluntary. Policy is intended to affect the 'real' world, by guiding the decisions that are made. Whether they are formally written or not, most organizations have identified policies.^[4]

Such posts should, however, be reported to an Administrator for review. Your use of this website is your acceptance of these terms and conditions of use. Neither the owners, employees, officers nor directors of Signs 101 shall be held responsible or liable under any legal theory for any loss or injury resulting from any post, information made available, policy, action or lack of an action at Signs 101. Teamviewer 12 free download.

Policies may be classified in many different ways. The following is a sample of several different types of policies broken down by their effect on members of the organization.^{[citation needed]}

Distributive policies[edit]

Distributive policies extend goods and services to members of an organization, as well as distributing the costs of the goods/services amongst the members of the organization. Examples include government policies that impact spending for welfare, public education, highways, and public safety, or a professional organization's benefits plan.^{[citation needed]}

Regulatory policies[edit]

Regulatory policies, or mandates, limit the discretion of individuals and agencies, or otherwise compel certain types of behavior. These policies are generally thought to be best applied when good behavior can be easily defined and bad behavior can be easily regulated and punished through fines or sanctions. An example of a fairly successful public regulatory policy is that of a highway speed limit.^{[citation needed]}

Constituent policies[edit]

Constituent policies create executive power entities, or deal with laws. Constituent policies also deal with Fiscal Policy in some circumstances.^{[citation needed]}

Redistributive policies[edit]

Policies are dynamic; they are not just static lists of goals or laws. Policy blueprints have to be implemented, often with unexpected results. Social policies are what happens 'on the ground' when they are implemented, as well as what happens at the decision making or legislative stage.^{[citation needed]}

When the term policy is used, it may also refer to:^{[citation needed]}

• Official government policy (legislation or guidelines that govern how laws should be put into operation)
• Broad ideas and goals in political manifestos and pamphlets
• A company or organization's policy on a particular topic. For example, the equal opportunity policy of a company shows that the company aims to treat all its staff equally.

The actions the organization actually takes may often vary significantly from stated policy. This difference is sometimes caused by political compromise over policy, while in other situations it is caused by lack of policy implementation and enforcement. Implementing policy may have unexpected results, stemming from a policy whose reach extends further than the problem it was originally crafted to address. Additionally, unpredictable results may arise from selective or idiosyncratic enforcement of policy.^{[citation needed]}

Types of policy analysis include:

• Causal (resp. non-causal)
• Deterministic (resp. stochastic, randomized and sometimes non-deterministic)
• Index
• Memoryless (e.g., non-stationary)
• Opportunistic (resp. non-opportunistic)
• Stationary (resp. non-stationary)

These qualifiers can be combined, so one could, for example, have a stationary-memoryless-index policy.

Specific policy types[edit]

• Communications and Information Policy is under Information policy
• Environmental Policy and National Environmental Policy Act
• Transportation policy
• Water policy

Other uses of the term[edit]

• In enterprise architecture for systems design, policy appliances are technical control and logging mechanisms to enforce or reconcile policy (systems use) rules and to ensure accountability in information systems.
• In insurance, policies are contracts between insurer and insured used to indemnify (protect) against potential loss from specified perils. While these documents are referred to as policies, they are in actuality a form of contract – see insurance contract.
• In gambling, policy is a form of an unsanctioned lottery, where players purport to purchase insurance against a chosen number being picked by a legitimate lottery. Or can refer to an ordinary Numbers game
• In artificial intelligence planning and reinforcement learning, a policy prescribes a non-empty deliberation (sequence of actions) given a non-empty sequence of states.
• In debate, the term 'policy' is slang for policy or cross-examination debate.

See also[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

1. ^Office, Publications. 'What is policy'. sydney.edu.au. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
2. ^Robert T. Nakamura, THE TEXTBOOK POLICY PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH:Review of Policy Research Volume 7, Issue 1, pages 142–154, September 1987http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00034.x/abstract
3. ^Young, John and Enrique Mendizabal. Helping researchers become policy entrepreneurs, Overseas Development Institute, London, September 2009.
4. ^https://perguntasaopo.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lowi_1972_four-systems-of-policy-politics-and-choice.pdf

• Blakemore, Ken (1998). Social Policy: an Introduction.
• Althaus, Catherine; Bridgman, Peter; Davis, Glyn (2007). The Australian Policy Handbook (4th ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
• Müller, Pierre; Surel, Yves (1998). L'analyse des politiques publiques (in French). Paris: Montchrestien.
• Paquette, Laure (2002). Analyzing National and International Policy. Rowman Littlefield.
• Howard, Cosmo. 'The Policy Cycle: a Model of Post-Machiavellian Policy Making?' The Australian Journal of Public Administration, September 2005.
• Jenkins, William (1978). Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective. London: Martin Robertson.
• Lowi, Theodore J.; Bauer, Raymond A.; De Sola Pool, Ithiel; Dexter, Lewis A. (1964). 'American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory'. World Politics. 16 (4): 687–713. doi:10.2307/2009452. JSTOR2009452.
• Lowi, Theodore J. (1972). 'Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice'. Public Administration Review. 32 (4): 298–310. doi:10.2307/974990. JSTOR974990.
• Feltus, Christophe (2008). 'Preliminary Literature Review of Policy Engineering Methods - Toward Responsibility Concept'. Proceeding of 3rd international conference on information and communication technologies : from theory to applications (ICTTA 08), Damascus, Syria; Preliminary Literature Review of Policy Engineering Methods – Toward Responsibility Concept.External link in publisher= (help)
• Lowi, Theodore J. (1985). 'The State in Politics'. In Noll, Roger G. (ed.) (ed.). Regulatory Policy and the social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 67–110.CS1 maint: Extra text: editors list (link)
• Spitzer, Robert J. (June 1987). 'Promoting Policy Theory: Revising the Arenas of Power'. Policy Studies Journal. 15 (4): 675–689. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1987.tb00753.x.
• Kellow, Aynsley (Summer 1988). 'Promoting Elegance in Policy Theory: Simplifying Lowi's Arenas of Power'. Policy Studies Journal. 16 (4): 713–724. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1988.tb00680.x.
• Heckathorn, Douglas D.; Maser, Steven M. (1990). 'The Contractual Architecture of Public Policy: A Critical Reconstruction of Lowi's Typology'. The Journal of Politics. 52 (4): 1101–1123. doi:10.2307/2131684. JSTOR2131684.
• Smith, K. B. (2002). 'Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification'. Policy Studies Journal. 30 (3): 379–395. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2002.tb02153.x.
• Greenberg, George D.; et al. (December 1977). 'Developing Public Policy Theory: Perspectives from Empirical Research'. American Political Science Review. 71 (4): 1532–1543. doi:10.2307/1961494. JSTOR1961494.
• Dye, Thomas R. (1976). Policy Analysis. University of Alabama Press.

• Stone, Diane.'Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities and their Networks', Journal of Policy Sciences, 2008

Further reading[edit]

• K. Cummins, Linda (2011). Policy Practice for Social Workers: New Strategies for a New Era. Pearson. ISBN9780205022441.
• Hicks, Daniel L.; Hicks, Joan Hamory; Maldonado, Beatriz (January 2016). 'Women as policy makers and donors: female legislators and foreign aid'. European Journal of Political Economy. 41: 46–60. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.10.007.

External links[edit]

Look up policy in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• Policy institutes at Curlie

Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.

pol·i·cy ¹

(pŏl′ĭ-sē)n.pl.pol·i·cies2.

pol·i·cy ²

(pŏl′ĭ-sē)n.pl.pol·i·cies

policy

(ˈpɒlɪsɪ) n, pl-cies

policy

(ˈpɒlɪsɪ) n, pl-cies

pol•i•cy¹

(ˈpɒl ə si)
n., pl. -cies.

pol•i•cy²

(ˈpɒl ə si)
n., pl. -cies.

policy

- Meaning 'insurance document,' it is from a French word meaning 'certificate, contract,' from an earlier Latin word meaning 'a receipt or security for money paid.'

politics

– policy – political1. 'politics'

The noun politicsWindows 10 patch for easyworship 2009 build 1.9. is usually used to refer to the methods by which people get, keep, and use power in a country or society.

When politics is used like this, you can use either a singular or plural form of a verb with it. It is more common to use a singular form.

Politics can refer to a particular set of beliefs about how countries should be governed or power should be used. When you use politics like this, you use a plural form of a verb with it.

Politics can also refer to the study of the ways in which countries are governed, and of the ways in which people get and use power. When you use politics like this, you must use a singular form of a verb with it.

2. 'policy'

There is no noun 'politic'. To refer to a course of action or plan that has been agreed upon by a government or political party, use policy.

3. 'political'

Don't use 'politic' as an adjective to mean 'relating to politics'. Use political.

Noun	1.	policy - a plan of action adopted by an individual or social group; 'it was a policy of retribution'; 'a politician keeps changing his policies' activism - a policy of taking direct and militant action to achieve a political or social goal beggar-my-neighbor policy, beggar-my-neighbor strategy, beggar-my-neighbour policy, beggar-my-neighbour strategy - a policy of promoting oneself at the expense of others; used especially of national policy; 'the United States has pursued a beggar-my-neighbor policy' plan of action - a plan for actively doing something centralism - the political policy of concentrating power in a central organization containment - a policy of creating strategic alliances in order to check the expansion of a hostile power or ideology or to force it to negotiate peacefully; 'containment of communist expansion was a central principle of United States' foreign policy from 1947 to the 1975' moderationism - the policy of being moderate or acting with moderation obscurantism - a policy of opposition to enlightenment or the spread of knowledge Thatcherism - (England) the political policy of Margaret Thatcher ultramontanism - (Roman Catholic Church) the policy that the absolute authority of the church should be vested in the pope
2.	policy - a line of argument rationalizing the course of action of a government; 'they debated the policy or impolicy of the proposed legislation' line of reasoning, logical argument, argumentation, argument, line - a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; 'I can't follow your line of reasoning' clericalism - a policy of supporting the influence and power of the clergy in secular or political matters plank - an endorsed policy in the platform of a political party economic policy - a government policy for maintaining economic growth and tax revenues social policy - a policy of for dealing with social issues party line - the policy of a political group; 'He won in a vote along party lines' foreign policy - a policy governing international relations zero-tolerance policy - any policy that allows no exception; 'a zero-tolerance policy toward pedophile priests' Zionism - a policy for establishing and developing a national homeland for Jews in Palestine
3.	policy - written contract or certificate of insurance; 'you should have read the small print on your policy' contract - a binding agreement between two or more persons that is enforceable by law floating policy, floater - an insurance policy covering loss of movable property (e.g. jewelry) regardless of its location

policy

noun

policy

noun

policy

¹[ˈpɒlɪsɪ]A.N

policy

²[ˈpɒlɪsɪ]N (alsoinsurance policy) → pólizaf
to take out a policy → sacar una póliza, hacerse un seguro

policy

[ˈpɒlɪsi]n

policy

: policy-making

policy

¹n

policy

²

policy

¹[ˈpɒlɪsɪ]

policy

²[ˈpɒlɪsɪ]n (alsoinsurance policy) → polizza (d'assicurazione)
to take out a policy → fareorstipulare un'assicurazione

policy¹

(ˈpoləsi) – plural ˈpolicies – noun

policy²

(ˈpoləsi) – plural ˈpolicies – noun

policy

policy

n (pl-cies) póliza; política; insurance — póliza de seguro; It’s not our policy to give confidential information over the telephone.No estamos autorizados a proporcionar información confidencial por teléfono.
Want to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, or visit the webmaster's page for free fun content.
Link to this page: